Get every deal in writing, with an AI agent that documents every step of your playbook

Fluint’s AI documents each customer’s journey from first call to upsell, with written business cases, demo agendas, exec briefings, mutual action plans, handoff docs, and... well, you get the idea.

No rep login required

Fluint triggers workflows based on your playbook and CRM stage, running on “autopilot” in the background.

Close adoption gaps

Before Fluint, just 8% of deals have a full set of account docs. After, every deal is a “key account,” with detailed write-ups.

True ‘buying’ evidence

Written deal briefs sharing highlights and gaps. So you always know where things stand, and commit with confidence.

Keep your entire deal team on the same page (literally)

Content tailored for every role: exec summaries for your champions, deal briefs for your CRO, demo agendas for your SE’s, handoff docs for your CSM’s, and more.

Find and fill deal gaps in < 60 seconds

Get written account summaries highlighting progress and gaps with concise bullet points—not long meetings and messy notes.

Stop losing deals when you’re not in the room

Build influence where it matters most: the internal buying conversations happening about you, without you.

I bet my career on Selling With and rolling out Fluint in front of our board. We’ve been all in, and it’s paid off, big time — including our largest deal in company history.”

Chris B.
VP of Sales

Drive 10.4x sales velocity with Fluint

Here’s a snapshot of the outcomes sales leaders are creating by building their sales process with Fluint.

5x higher win rate
5x

Driving executive engagement by Stage 2 & 3 to boost win rates

38 day faster deal cycle
38

Cut your time in procurement, and late-stage deal stall

$28K increase to ACV
$28k

Tying deals to buying priorities = less discounts + more value

How top sales leaders win more revenue – with less people and pipeline

See how revenue teams are converting their hard-earned pipeline, and winning > 50% of qualified opportunities, by selling with Fluint.

Got questions? We got you.

Scan some quick answers here, or book a time to chat 1:1.

We're trying to consolidate our tech, why add another one in?

Consolidation is good. But only if your tech stack already closed the single, biggest gap in every sales process:

Guiding the internal buying conversations sales reps aren’t part of.

Which is where 90% of B2B buying happens. Yet, most tech stacks only focus on sales reps in sales meetings.

Which means even after consolidating tech spend, you’d focus all that reduced spend on just a fraction of where deals are won or lost.

We use a Conversation Intelligence tool. Will this conflict?

No, if you use Gong, Chorus, or another tool, you’ll keep it in place. These tools coach your pitch during sales conversations.

Fluint creates content to guide your buyer’s internal meetings. They’re different use cases.

We just use the call transcript from these systems as a data source

What if Fluint doesn't actually help our sellers?

We pay back 2X what you spent on any seller's license who used, but didn't directly close a deal in Fluint. It's our Revenue Guarantee.

(And yeah, we’re serious.)

Okay... but can't we just do this with ChatGPT?

Most teams do start here. Then they realize ChatGPT and CoPilot aren’t ideal.

The biggest reason is sellers don't stick with it. All the copying over inputs for each deal, hitting data limits, then getting output that's not sales-specific and ready to use is frustrating.

Which means there's no consistent execution inside deals.

For example: What percent of your sellers have used ChatGPT before? Likely a lot of them.

What percent of your deals have a business case? Likely very little of them.

What about pre-built template decks? Can’t we use those instead?

You can save templated content inside Fluint, for sure.

But you'll also want to go beyond templates, to creating new content with champions, specific to their account.

That’s the IKEA effect at work. And it makes sure your champions actually want to use your content to sell internally (where it matters most).

We're rolling out sales frameworks & doing training. Does this conflict?

Nope, Fluint is framework "agnostic."

You can load any methodology into Fluint (MEDDICC, SPICED, take your pick) to help reps execute on it consistently, across all deals.

Which also creates "evidence" of whether they’re using it, or not.

The process Fluint enables is also higher-level than a particular framework — it's a way of selling with the buyer at each step, to help them sell internally.

How does this compare to our value engineering process?

Fluint scales up a “lightweight” version of your process, to every single deal in the pipeline. While Value Engineers focus on a smaller number of high-priority deals.

(1) Sellers start the business case process in Stage 1 vs. waiting until later.

(2) Fluint also focuses on the strategic narrative, to complement the numbers.

If a Value Engineer starts an in-depth value model later in the deal, they’ll already have an executive audience, plus all the "inputs" pre-structured.

Can we start with just a couple reps in a small pilot?

Fluint isn't a quick "workflow hack." It's about shifting the way sellers go to market, where the sales process is building the business case.

Every step of the way: from discovery, to running demos, etc.

It takes focus for each rep to make this shift. So when they know their leadership is fully committed, and their peers around the company are doing the same, it drives outcomes.

So you’re welcome to do a pilot.

But we see faster adoption from cohorts of reps without pilots first, because there’s strong commitment.